The Vimy Foundation is proud to announce the recipients of the 2019 Vimy Pilgrimage Award. This award recognizes the actions of young people who demonstrate an outstanding commitment to volunteer work through positive contributions, notable deeds, or bravery that benefits their peers, school, community, province, or country.
The Vimy Pilgrimage Award consists of a fully funded week-long educational program in Belgium and France to study Canada’s tremendous First World War effort. The program, scheduled for April 2–10, 2019 features daily visits to important First World War sites including museums, cemeteries, and historic battlefields, as well as participation in the Vimy Day commemoration ceremony at the Canadian National Vimy Memorial.
20 students were selected from across Canada. We are so thankful to everyone who applied and appreciate your dedication to community service and your interest in Canadian history.
Congratulations to this year’s winners:
Stephanie Budden – Stephenville, Newfoundland and Labrador
Keneisha Charles – Kelowna, British Columbia
Katie Clyburne – Halifax, Nova Scotia
Zachary Collins – Toronto, Ontario
David He – Burnaby, British Columbia
Faith Emiry – Massey, Ontario
Elizabeth Gagné – Regina, Saskatchewan
Rosalie Gendron – Lévis, Québec
Cassandra Gillen – Pointe-Claire, Québec
Brooke Glazier – North Vancouver, British Columbia
Aidan Hupé – Whitehorse, Yukon
Gillian Huppee – Foam Lake, Saskatchewan
Navjot Kaur Khaira – Surrey, British Columbia
Andrew Poirier – York (Haldimand County), Ontario
David Pugh – Brantford, Ontario
Emma Roy – Sainte-Sophie, Québec
Declan Sander – Lethbridge, Alberta
Joon Hyeong Sohn – Surrey, British Columbia
Theo Thompson-Armstrong – Halifax, Nova Scotia
Eric Weidmann – Fort Saskatchewan, Alberta
Thank you to our lead sponsor Scotiabank for their generous support of the Vimy Pilgrimage Award. Scotiabank aims to support organizations that are committed to helping young people reach their infinite potential.
This program is also sponsored by Air Canada: The First World War is an important, strategic moment in Canadian history and Air Canada is proud to support our youth and tomorrow’s leaders by sponsoring the 2019 Vimy Pilgrimage Award, allowing 20 exceptional teenagers from across Canada to learn and remember.
Thank you to Canada’s History for their ongoing support of the Vimy Pilgrimage Award.
Following the armistice to end the fighting on November 11, 1918, as Canadian troops began the return voyage to Canada, the victorious Allied nations prepared to meet at Versailles, France to draw up the treaty terms to formally conclude the war.
While the Dominion countries were not originally invited to have separate representation, during the months of preparation for the Paris Peace conference, Sir Robert Borden demanded that Canada have a distinct seat due to the immense contribution and sacrifice of Canada during the war.
Despite reservations from other countries, particularly the United States who felt that representation from the dominions equated to a larger voice for Britain, as a result of Borden and the other delegates’ efforts Canada and the other dominions succeeded in their claims and did gain a place at the table.
The main result of the Paris Peace Conference, the Treaty of Versailles, was signed on June 28, 1919, five years after the assassination of Franz Ferdinand and his wife.
Canada signed the Treaty independently, but the signature was indented under “British Empire”. While this did reflect the continued ambiguity of Canada and the other dominions’ role in the world, it did represent a significant step for Canada gaining full independence over its foreign policy and also a seat in the League of Nations.
John W. Dafoe was one of Canada’s most influential journalists, and in 1919, he attended the Paris Peace Conference as a representative of the Canadian Press and greatly informed Canadians’ understanding of the proceedings. A fervent promoter of Canadian autonomy in external relations, Dafoe encouraged Canadian participation in international conferences and organizations that emerged in the wake of the First World War. In 1928, with Sir Robert Borden, Sir Arthur Currie and Sir Joseph W. Flavelle, he founded the Canadian Institute of International Affairs (CIIA) to help Canadians better prepare for their role in international meetings.
On November 4, 2018, historian and author Charlotte Gray spoke to attendees in Cobourg, Ontario about “Women in the First World War”.
She started her lecture by discussing the stories we tell as a country about our own history:
“Aspects of the First World War have passed from history into mythology. The stories we in this country have told ourselves about our national origins evolve with each generation. The re-emergence of Vimy into collective memory is part of one such origin story. And it’s a story that the federal government in fact of the early 20th century promoted: Canada as a warrior nation. This story now runs parallel to other national origin stories.
For instance, in the late 19th century, the story of Canada was seen as the story of the Dominion of entirely British character. This is the imperial story: it’s the colony to nation story. Then, in the mid-20th century, another version of Canadian history surfaced, this one in which East-West links defined the country. First the mighty waterways, then the railroads were the glue that kept this country together. Suddenly it wasn’t history that defined Canada, it was our geography.
Can we separate myth from history in this post-truth era? Most of us have actually come to realize that every version of history is laden with value judgments, biases, and assumptions about whose voices should be heard – and particularly, whose voices should be ignored.”
Charlotte then mentions that it is now commonly believed that the Great War revolutionized women’s lives: “It’s always been said that it liberated working class women from the drudgery of domestic service by opening up other opportunities. We also assume that within the limitations of the fiercely segregated gender roles back then, women were all as committed to the national effort as the men.” However, as she will point out, some of the ways that the First World War impacted women’s lives were not as straightforward as we like to assume today. But for women the most radical impact on their lives was that most of them would be granted the right to vote in federal elections.
In this short clip, Charlotte Gray discusses the dilemma faced by suffragists at the outbreak of war in 1914:
What about our traditional understanding of the roles of women during the war?
Margaret Atwood writes in They Fought in Colour about some of the changing roles for women at this point: “Many people had war-connected jobs. Women stepped into jobs that would have been done by men if there had been enough men remaining to do them. Women ran farms, worked in factories making shells and other military equipment, and sewed uniforms and war gear, including the trench coats that became such an important garment for those living in the cold wet mud-tunnels of the front. Women also tended gardens, ran canning clubs to preserve food, sold Victory Bonds, and helped with recruitment drives. They joined war committees, raising money to send care packages to the troops, or to train nurses to serve not only overseas but — increasingly — back home, tending the soldiers who were too mangled to be patched up and sent back to the trenches.”
But even in less-traditional roles, tensions still existed within the women’s movement. Watch this clip of Charlotte Gray discussing the work of women in munitions factories:
After years of effort, the right to vote was finally extended at the federal level to (some) women. From Charlotte Gray: “And then, in September 1917, the Union Government led by Prime Minister Robert Borden, passed its Wartime Elections Act. The government’s motivation in introducing this bill was transparent and had little to do with commitment to equal rights or social justice. The government’s preoccupation was its commitment to send yet more men to the front, but the supply of volunteers had dried up.
Conscription appeared to be the only solution but it was deeply unpopular with many groups, particularly within Quebec. The Prime Minister realized he needed to demonstrate popular support for conscription, so he extended the franchise first to nurses, who looked after hospitals in France, and then to the wives, widows, mothers and sisters of soldiers serving overseas. All strongly in favour of conscription. Their boys were in the trenches. They knew they needed help. Many of them had been fighting without any kind of break or relief for more than a year, more than two years. It was unbelievably hard.
But whatever the government’s Machiavellian motivation in 1917, the cat was now out of the bag. There was no way that suffrage at the federal level could be rolled back. It had to be granted more widely. And in May 1918, all women over the age of 21 and not alien-born, and meeting the property requirements of their province, were allowed to vote in federal elections.
However the Act did not apply to all women. Besides the alien-born, women from minority groups, including women from Asian backgrounds, were not granted voting rights. And it would be another 42 years before indigenous women, alongside men, got the unconditional right to vote.”
In summary, Charlotte Gray believes that: “Despite the appearances, World War One’s impact on women’s lives was less than it has often been painted.”
– Charlotte Gray quotes Nellie McClung as saying that if women had been in charge of the world, the First World War would not have happened. Do you think this is the case? Are women more attuned to peace-making than men? Do women run countries differently than men? Look at current and past political female leaders around the world as you consider your position.
– We often think of the First World War provided a chance for women to take on new jobs and roles in society. Why would the impact of the First World War on women’s lives have been exaggerated?
– Imagine you are the wife, daughter or sister to someone in an ethnic group who was interned during the war, such as Ukrainian, German, or Polish. Is it fair that you would not have the right to vote at the same time as other women? Describe how you would feel after the Wartime Elections Act of 1917.
– Imagine you are a woman working in a factory during the war, producing munitions for the war effort. When the war ends, you no longer have a job as the returning veterans take up jobs at the factories. How would this make you feel?
– Motherhood is a theme that comes up regularly in discussions about the suffrage movement during the First World War. Why was this so central to debates about women voting?
– Charlotte Gray posits that the voices we exclude from our history stories are just as informative as the voices we include. Are there still voices missing from our understanding of the First World War? Where should we look to fill in some of those voices 100 years later?
– This page contains photos that have been colourized. Use the Vimy 100 in the Classroom guide on ‘Photography in the First World War‘ to analyze the photos and the addition of colour.
Thank you to our supporters of the First World War Centennial Speaker Series: The Government of Canada and the R. Howard Webster Foundation.
The German government had begun peace negotiations with the Allies on October 4when it sent a telegram to President Wilson. With its allies dropping out of the war (Bulgaria signed an armistice on September 30, the Ottoman Empire on October 30and the Austro-Hungarian Empire on November 3), its armies in full retreat and its population starving at home, Germany had no choice but to pursue an Armistice.
However, armistice negotiations take time, and the allies, especially Wilson, refused to negotiate with anything but a democratic government in Germany. Although the Germans hoped for a negotiated peace, it soon became clear that the Allies, especially France, would not settle for anything less than an unconditional surrender.
In the midst of the general rapid German retreat, there were still ambushes, artillery attacks and intense firefights for villages in which German units had decided to make a last stand. The Canadians crossed into Belgium on November 7, and by November 9they were in the outlying suburbs of Mons.
General Currie had orders to capture the city, so he ordered an attack on Mons on November 10. While Currie knew war would be over soon, he had no confirmation of this, or of the Kaiser’s abdication, by November 10. Nevertheless, this decision has caused much controversy ever since, with some accusing Currie of being a butcher and sacrificing Canadian lives for a symbolic victory when the war was already won.
The city of Mons was symbolic as it was where the British Expeditionary Force had fought their first engagement with the Germans back in 1914. To retake it on the last day of the war was a powerful symbol. It had also been under German occupation for the entirety of the war, and used as a critical logistical centre. Currie wanted to take it to break German morale, and ensure that the Germans did not think they had any pieces for negotiation. While Currie’s senior officers did not protest, the men on the ground were less pleased, but obeyed nonetheless.
The Battle of Mons itself was planned as an encircling maneuver, with the 2nd Division attacking from the South and Southeast, and the 3rd Division attacking from the East. On November 10, the Canadians pushed into the outskirts of the city, with patrol skirmishes but no large-scale assaults on dug-in German positions. There was no massive bombardment of the city, according to orders from higher command.
At around 11pm, platoons from the 42nd Battalion and the RCR made it through the southern defences of the city. From the west, other companies crossed into the city over bridges. By early morning on November 11, those units were engaged in urban combat, street fighting as they moved into the city. The last of the German defenders were surrendering or dying when, at 6:30am, the Canadian Corps headquarters got the news that the Armistice would begin at 11am. It took time for the message to get across the front, but most units knew by 9am. The Canadians finished pushing the Germans out of the city and pursued them East. The civilian inhabitants of Mons awoke to find themselves liberated.
Fourteen men from the 42ndand the RCR were killed, seventy wounded and two missing during the attack on Mons. Casualties from the 2nd Division’s attack are unknown.
The last soldier of the British Empire to die in the First World War was a Canadian. Private George Price of the 28th Battalion, 2nd Division, was killed by a sniper bullet to the chest at 10:58 on November 11. Two minutes later, the guns fell silent.
During the Hundred Days Campaign, from August 8 to November 11, the Canadian Corps lost over 45,000 casualties. In the entire war, the Canadian Expeditionary Force sent roughly 425,000 Canadians to Europe. The Canadians Corps suffered over 60,000 killed and 172,000 wounded.
On November 9, 2018, two days before the 100th anniversary of the end of the First World War, the Vimy Foundation will open the gates to a modern living memorial in commemoration of the centenary of the armistice of the First World War, the first of its kind. The Vimy Foundation Centennial Park located adjacent to the Vimy Memorial at Vimy Ridge in France will welcome visitors to walk its paths of remembrance surrounded by over 100 Oak trees repatriated back to Vimy from Canada. Centennial benches, built in Canada and placed throughout the park, provide an opportunity for gathering, dialogue, and extended reflection, all essential elements to conflict resolution and peace that the monument inspires.
Built on private farmland purchased by the Vimy Foundation, the land has required extensive demining and preparation prior to creation of the park. Through the land preparation process, many artifacts were discovered including shells (some of which were still active), grenades, fuses and communications wires, as well as the remains of soldiers who fought at Vimy Ridge over 100 years ago and who have now been put to rest in an official military graveyard.
As a living memorial and park, the four-acre Vimy Foundation Centennial Park is both a public green space for neighbouring communities as well as a place for remembrance and education. The Park highlights the natural bonds between France and Canada, the desire for peace, our responsibility to remember and was designed by acclaimed Canadian Landscape Architect Linda Dicaire.
Some major components of the Vimy Foundation Centennial Park include, the repatriated Vimy Oaks (picked on the battlefield in 1917 by a Canadian soldier, grown in Canada, and now brought back to France) provided by the Vimy Oaks Legacy Group, and the Bugler Memorial Sculpture designed by renowned Canadian artist Marlene Hilton Moore and gifted by the City of Barrie and the communities surrounding Canadian Forces Base Bordon. The Borden Centennial Bugler is one of two, a twin statue stands at the entrance to CFB Borden. The buglers call out across generations, across geography to each other and to the now-empty trenches that once trained soldiers before they left for battle overseas.
“The Vimy Foundation Centennial Park is a truly unique place of remembrance and reflection on the lasting impact of the war on all the countries and people involved,” says Jeremy Diamond, Executive Director of the Vimy Foundation. “The park will have an impact on all who visit, and thanks to the generosity of our donors, who sponsored the many aspects of the park in remembrance of soldiers who fought for Canada over 100 years ago, it also has a very personal connection for many.”
100 years later, the First World War continues to demonstrate its ongoing impact, scarring the soil of the battlefields. The story of the creation of the Vimy Foundation Centennial Park showcases the devastating impact the First World War had not only for the soldiers and the countries involved, but also on the land where the battles took place.
The Vimy Foundation Centennial Park would not have been possible without the generous support of public and private organizations and individuals from across Canada, in particular lead sponsor The Province of British Columbia, Centennial Flagpole sponsor Molson Coors, and the sponsor of the Bugler Memorial Sculpture, CFB Borden.
Premier of British Columbia, John Horgan:
“It is a privilege to be able to provide a contribution on behalf of the people of British Columbia for the Vimy Foundation Centennial Park. It is a significant way that we can honour the brave Canadians who fought so hard here a century ago in order to preserve our rights and freedoms.”
Fred Landtmeters, President and CEO, Molson Coors:
“As Canada’s oldest brewer and a proud Canadian company, Molson Coors values the importance of paying tribute to Canada’s veterans and honouring the sacrifices of our brothers and sisters in the Armed Forces. By commemorating the service of Captain Percival Molson, M.C. through our donation of the Centennial Park flagpole, the Canadian flag can fly proudly for generations of visitors. We are honoured to play a part in preserving Canada’s First World War legacy.”
Honorary Colonel James G. Massie, CFB Borden:
“The Borden Centennial Bugler honours the 100th anniversaries of Canadian Forces Base Borden, The Battle of Vimy Ridge and the Armistice to end The Great War; recognizing the immense contribution of Canadian Forces Base Borden to the training of the Canadian Expeditionary Force and acknowledges the bonds of service and sacrifice that tie Canadian Forces Base Borden, the City of Barrie and the City of Arras across the great oceans of space and time.”
First World War Centennial Speaker Series Stephen Brunt and Bob Weeks Manitoba Sports Hall of Fame Winnipeg, MB October 18, 2018
On October 18, 2018, Stephen Brunt of Sportsnet and Bob Weeks of TSN spoke with assembled guests at the Manitoba Sports Hall of Fame about the important role of sports and entertainment during the First World War.
As a contributor to our new publication They Fought in Colour from Dundurn Press, Stephen Brunt has written:
“Art and sport are part of what defines us as human, even when faced with inhuman conditions. During the First World War, on the front lines and anywhere else where troops were assembled, trained, or taken to heal, games and entertainment emerged organically in the most dire circumstances imaginable. We want to play; we want to sing and dance and be entertained; we want to laugh and cry and cheer and interact as an audience. That’s true even near the battlefield.”
He spoke to guests at our event about why the military would have encouraged soldiers to play sports and games while they were overseas:
And they played many different types of sport while in the military. A makeshift game of cricket, a rugby match: these were common for many of the British troops and Canadians at the time. Football (soccer to most North Americans these days) was the most popular pastime on both sides of the lines, and only needing a ball and some goal posts certainly made it easy to create a match.
Brunt writes: “The Canadians and the Newfoundlanders were certainly familiar with those British games, but they also brought with them sports that were distinctly North American — baseball, whenever someone could round up a ball and bat and gloves, and in wintertime, if there was ice, if there were skates, a game of shinny would inevitably break out, providing both some much-needed fun and a reminder of home.”
Many Canadian athletes of the early 20th century enlisted with the Canadian Expeditionary Force and went overseas to join the fight. Six of these outstanding athletes had already represented Canada in the Olympic Games by the time the war broke out. Bob Weeks discussed their potential motivation and highlights Alex Decoteau in particular:
On Dominion Day during the last year of the war, fifty thousand Canadians assembled for sporting events at Tincques, fourteen miles west of Arras, in northern France. It was the Canadian Corps Championships of July 1, 1918.
Engineers had put together a stadium, VIP platform, and theatre stage. Many distinguished guests attended, including Sir Robert Borden, General John J. Pershing (Commander-in-chief, American Expeditionary Forces) and the Duke of Connaught, with Lt.-Gen. Arthur Currie as the Honorary President of the event. The Canadian YMCA provided the equipment and décor, and catered the refreshments for the non-officers.The events of the day included more traditional sports competitions – foot races, baseball, boxing, lacrosse and tennis – as well as more unusual and fun events: pillow fighting, sack races, and tug-of-war.
Stephen Brunt looks at other forms of entertainment during the First World War as well, writing: “Music was also an important diversion for troops during the war. In addition to the formal military bands, if a soldier could play an instrument or was blessed with a fine singing voice, his comrades would call out for a tune. As with athletes, some of the best professional musicians were in uniform during the war, and their talents were particularly sought out.”
“In 1917, near Vimy Ridge, ten members of the Canadian Army 3rd Division got together under the direction of Mert Plunkett, and “The Dumbells” were born. The name came from the 3rd Division’s emblem, a red dumbbell symbolizing strength.”
The Dumbells entertained Canadian troops during war with music and comedy, and enjoyed such popularity that they continued touring for years after the war ended as well. You can catch a glimpse of what their musical comedy entailed by watching a tribute performance from Soldiers of Song, based on the original works of the Dumbells.
– The Olympic Games is mentioned multiple times here. Athletes would have travelled to other parts of the world to compete against other countries in sports. Contrast this with their experiences travelling overseas to fight a war. Both war and the Olympics are often discussed through a lens of ‘nationalism’. Would there be a similar pride in one’s country? How would this change from a sporting competition to a war?
– Do you agree with Bob Weeks’ suggestion that athletes enlisted in the Canadian Expeditionary Force to be heroes? Why or why not? What does it mean to be a hero in wartime? What does it mean to be a hero in times of peace?
– This page contains photos that have been colourized. Use the Vimy 100 in the Classroom guide on ‘Photography in the First World War‘ to analyze the photos and the addition of colour.
– Sports helped keep soldiers in good physical condition, and helped with physical therapy as they recovered from injuries. Why would music and comedy have been important to soldiers?
– Why was it so important to his fellow soldiers that they recover the silver watch of Alex Decoteau? How do you imagine that they felt being able to send it home to his mother?
After a general retreat through October 1918, the German Army decided to make a stand in Valenciennes, a strategically-located city of several thousand French civilians, and the last major French city still under German control. The German commanders believed that the Allies would not bombard a city full of French civilians, and further consolidated their position by flooding the area around the city.
On October 27, General Horne, General Currie and the British 22nd Corps Commander discussed the best way to take Valenciennes. They decided that they needed to take Mont Houy, a fortified hill overlooking the city first. The plan was for the 51st Division of the British 22nd Corps to take Mont Houy and press on to the sunken road (the “Red Line”) on October 28, then the 4th Canadian Division would pass through the 51st and take the “Blue Line” which included the outskirts of Valenciennes. Then on November first, the Canadian 4th Division would take the high ground to the east of the city, to allow the rest of the Corps to cross the Escaut canal and take the “Green Line”, which included the city.
On October 28, the 51st Division failed to reach the Red Line in the face of strong German opposition, but by night they held most of the southern slope of the hill, le Poirier Station and the village of Famars. As a result, the plan to take Valenciennes had to be revised, and quickly, since the city was a key point in the left flank of the major British offensive scheduled for Nov. 3. The Blue and Green lines were thus merged into one operation for the 10th Canadian Brigade, backed by mass artillery and supported by the 49th British Division on the right. The Brigade would assault Valencinennes from South to East, and the 12th Canadian Brigade would do the mopping-up after crossing the Canal de l’Escaut. The new plan was set for November 1.
On the night of October 29 the 47th and 44th Canadian Battalions took over the British lines, and sent out battle patrols to reconnoiter enemy positions and barbed wire. In preparation for the battle, the Canadian Corps Heavy Artillery was ordered to bombard the German positions day and night. The 10th Infantry Brigade alone had over 250 field and siege guns in support. One major complication was the presence of many civilians still in the city. The army wanted to spare them from heavy shellfire, and therefore focused on targeted attacks on known German military strongholds, such as the nearby village of Marly.
The first objective was Mont Houy, for which was prepared a unique artillery barrage with frontal creeping barrage, enfilade fire and oblique fire. Also heavy artillery support from across the canal (the pieces could not yet cross). Two machine gun battalions were also in support, while other artillery provided a smokescreen for the attack. The Canadians also invested manpower and almost fifty guns in an extensive counterbattery to find German machine gun nests in buildings in the city and bomb them, and to take out enemy artillery pieces.
The days preceding the attacks, as well as November 1 itself, had terrible weather,and when . the soldiers of the 44h and 46th Battalions started out of their positions at 5:15am on Nov. 1, they did so under the pouring rain. The Canadians advanced quickly behind a rolling barrage, but were forced to put on their respirators due to German gas shells. German artillery fire, however, was weak, both as a result of the effective Canadian counterbattery actions of the previous days and poor quality shells.
The Red line objective was achieved right on schedule, with the 44th Battalion taking Mount Houy in forty-five minutes. The German soldiers, “stupefied by the overwhelming barrage” began surrendering en masse. The Blue Line objective, in the outskirts of Valenciennes, was taken at 10:20 amby the 46th, despite being outnumbered by two or three to one by the defenders. The 47th Battalion reached the canal at that same time. Soon after, the Canadians started running into stiff resistance in the town of Marly, across the canal, and coming under heavy fire from machine guns in the south of the city. During the morning the 12th Brigade and 3rd Division establish bridgeheads over the Escaut, while the others encircled and pushed into the city. By noon the Canadians had reached the heart of the city
At the end of the day, the Germans were still in some parts of the city, but were pushed out gradually throught the night by the Canadian 12th Brigade. The 54th Battalion attacked the village of Marly on the morning of November 2, but discovered when they reached the village that the German Army had already retreated. By 8:30am, the Canadians were through to the far outskirts of the city and by the end of that day had completely taken the city. .
Casualties: German: 1800 captures, 800 killed. Canadian: 80 killed, 300 wounded. The German killed-to-captured ratio, which was unusually high, has been a matter of controversy ever since the battle. Some say that Canadian soldiers were less willing to take prisoners after 4 years of fighting, and especially after seeing how badly the local French populations had been treated by the occupiers.
Technological Advancements: The main technological innovation was the overpowering artillery barrage which marked the most artillery support for a single Canadian brigade in the entire war.
Strategies: The key strategies that made Valenciennes a success despite the odds were taking the high ground outside the city (Mont Houy) first, and massing the artillery to use for barrage, fire from three sides, counterbattery and targeted strikes. The battle of Valenciennes was also one of the few examples of urban combat during the war. Miltary commanders had been trying to avoid it, with General Currie in particular worried that the Canadian Corps had not been adequately trained for urban warfare.
Notable People: Sergeant Hugh Cairns of the 46th Battalion already had the DCM, which he won at Vimy. At Valenciennes he received Canada’s last Victoria Cross of the war by single-handedly charging two machine-gun nests. He was wounded late in the day on Nov. 1, and died of his wounds the next day.
We are proud to have worked with Edmonton, AB’s Armistice100YEG Committee on this beautiful video for the centennial anniversary of the Armistice.They have produced this video to reconnect Canadians to the history of John McCrae’s famous poem In Flanders Fields.
Through the narration of the poem, and the combination of animated colourized archival images from The Vimy Foundation and Canadian Colour mirrored with contemporary footage, the video offers a dynamic and reflective look into the past, and an opportunity to engage with the history of service and sacrifice of Canada’s military during the First World War.
The French version is in production and we will share as soon as it is completed. // La version française est en production et nous la partagerons dès qu’elle sera terminée.
First World War Centennial Speaker Series
Dr. Lee Windsor, Gregg Centre, UNB
Fredericton, New Brunswick
September 28, 2018
On September 28, 2018, Dr. Lee Windsor spoke with assembled guests at the Beaverbrook Art Gallery in Fredericton, NB about Canada’s Hundred Days campaign and the events taking place in France exactly one hundred years earlier.
After retreating from the Drocourt-Quéant Line, the German Army withdrew to their final defensive lines in the Hindenburg system. The sector along the Canadian front included the city of Cambrai, an important logistical centre for the Germans, the Canal du Nord, and Bourlon Wood, a fortified defense position. For nearly a month after their victory at the D-Q Line, the Canadians waited, while Currie planned how to get the Corps across the canal, through the wood and onward to Cambrai.
At 5:20 am on 27 September, the creeping barrage opened up and the initial advance of only four Canadian battalions went forward across the canal du Nord. They reached the other side successfully, and more battalions began to leap frog over their positions, slowly moving forward and fanning out to objectives along an over 9000m front.
Dr. Lee Windsor takes us through the actions that followed, after the Canadians prepared to dig in for the night:
The second day was significantly slower and harder than the first; the Canadian battalions were spread thin trying to control over 10 000m of frontage as they tried to cross the Marcoing Line and reach Cambrai. “Mounting a second and even larger deliberate attack one day after one of the most complicated operations in Canadian military history, after penetrating 5km into a well-defended enemy zone is asking a hell of a lot.”
Watch as Dr. Windsor discusses that first view of the Marcoing Line for the Royal Canadian Regiment, who focused on a direct hit to Cambrai allowed the rest of the Canadian Corps to swing around to the north. He discusses some of the actions of Milton Gregg on September 28, reading excerpts from Gregg’s journal:
Dr. Lee Windsor continues: “The fight raged all day, but the RCR’s D Company’s actions helped hold open that breach. Gregg and Duplessis had fixed enemy attention on the regiment and all of 7 Brigade’s sector while the rest of the unit swung north through a widening gap on the Arras-Cambrai road. They opened the door to Cambrai. It would take several more days of hard fighting to crack it all the way open but they opened it.”
The successes throughout the Hundred Days campaign came at a heavy cost for the Canadian Corps, incurring over 10,000 Canadian casualties in the Battle of Canal du Nord and the advance on and liberation of Cambrai.
– The actions during the Hundred Days Campaign and particularly here on September 28 are described as happening very quickly. The Canadian Corps is moving forward without much time to plan, prepare, and bring supplies. How did this differ from other battles of the First World War?
– At Vimy, soldiers waited in chalk tunnels underground prior to the battle; here, we hear how soldiers ‘rested’ in mud holes, waiting to attack. What do you think was running through the soldiers’ minds at night?
– This page contains two photos that have been colourized. Use the Vimy 100 in the Classroom guide on ‘Photography in the First World War‘ to analyze the photos and the addition of colour.
– When studying the First World War, students generally encounter the same four battles: Ypres, the Somme, Vimy Ridge and Passchendaele. While each was certainly critical to the war in its own way, Canadians served and made sacrifices in other, lesser-known battles, like at Canal du Nord and Cambrai. Use the Vimy Foundation’s resources from “Canada’s First World War Battles” and make a case for which battle was the most significant for Canada.
– The Victoria Cross belonging to Milton Gregg is now on permanent loan at the Royal Canadian Regiment Military Museum. In Canada, military medals and decorations are bought and sold regularly and there are no rules against it. Is this practice wrong? Why or why not?
After the success at Canal du Nord, the Canadians faced their main objective, the city of Cambrai. Cambrai was a key railway centre for the German army, and the site of a bloody battle the year before that saw the first major use of tanks. Now tanks were once again rolling towards the town.
By September 30, the 3rdand 4thDivisions had reached the outskirts of Cambrai, though efforts to capture the city stalled as the Corps circled it and Currie tried to work out a plan to take the city. Urban warfare was not something in which the Canadians, or most of the Allied armies, had experience, and fighting the German Army house-to-house was going to be not only extremely difficult, but also likely to result in very high casualties.
Cambrai itself was very lightly defended as German troops were pulled out to reinforce other areas, but the Canadians still had to contend with land mines and booby traps left behind. The city was liberated by the Allies on October 9, 1918. The Canadian Corps incurred over 10,000 Canadian casualties in the advance on and liberation of Cambrai.
Late at night on October 8th, 1918, Coulson Mitchell of Winnipeg saved a bridge from demolition during the Battle of Cambrai. The bridges across the Escaut Canal were key crossing points for Canadian soldiers and artillery, but the Germans had been blowing them up to slow the Allied advance. In a midnight patrol, Mitchell cut demolition wires and fended off an enemy attack, saving a key bridge. For his heroic actions, he was awarded the Victoria Cross. Read his full service file here: http://central.bac-lac.gc.ca/.item/?op=pdf&app=CEF&id=B6248-S044.